Walsh 
W-L: (10- 8) PR = 89.8590
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
215 H Lewis GLVC (12- 5, 95.1) 7-14
219 H D'Youville ECC ( 6- 8, 87.3) 11-12
222 H Frostburg State ECC ( 7- 9, 91.0) 13- 8
304 N Lander PBC ( 9- 7, 93.8) 4-14
308 H Northwood GMAC ( 5- 9, 86.6) 17- 6
311 H Tiffin GMAC ( 3- 9, 84.3) 13- 6
315 A Wheeling GMAC ( 8- 7, 88.4) 8-10
318 H Lake Erie GMAC ( 7- 7, 88.2) 15- 4
325 A Roberts Wesleyan ECC ( 6- 8, 89.5) 15-14
328 H Montevallo PBC (10- 6, 93.7) 5-11
401 H Malone GMAC ( 5-10, 84.9) 15-10
405 A Davenport GLVC ( 6- 9, 88.4) 16-17
412 H Thomas More GMAC ( 1-11, 83.0) 23-11
416 A Davis & Elkins GMAC ( 2-15, 79.7) 24- 6
422 H Seton Hill GMAC (17- 1, 98.6) 11-25
426 H Northwood GMAC ( 5- 9, 86.6) 20- 8
430 A Lake Erie GMAC ( 7- 7, 88.2) 10- 8
503 A Seton Hill GMAC (17- 1, 98.6) 5-20
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
215 H Lewis 7-14 -7 -5 -0.42
219 H D'Youville 11-12 -1 3 -- -4.25
222 H Frostburg State 13- 8 5 -1 ++ 5.52
304 N Lander 4-14 -10 -4 -1.07
308 H Northwood 17- 6 11 4 1.12
311 H Tiffin 13- 6 7 6 0.00
315 A Wheeling 8-10 -2 1 - -2.79
318 H Lake Erie 15- 4 11 2 + 2.67
325 A Roberts Wesleyan 15-14 1 0 1.33
328 H Montevallo 5-11 -6 -3 -1.78
401 H Malone 15-10 5 6 0.00
405 A Davenport 16-17 -1 1 -1.83
412 H Thomas More 23-11 12 8 0.00
416 A Davis & Elkins 24- 6 18 10 0.00
422 H Seton Hill 11-25 -14 -8 0.00
426 H Northwood 20- 8 12 4 1.12
430 A Lake Erie 10- 8 2 1 0.96
503 A Seton Hill 5-20 -15 -9 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
219 H D'Youville 11-12 -1 3 -- -4.25
315 A Wheeling 8-10 -2 1 - -2.79
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
222 H Frostburg State 13- 8 5 -1 ++ 5.52
318 H Lake Erie 15- 4 11 2 + 2.67
|
Walsh Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
Adams State |
Walsh |
|
 
| Walsh |
Adelphi |
Adelphi |
|
 
| Adelphi |
Alabama-Huntsville |
Alabama-Huntsville |
|
tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) |
Alabama-Huntsville |
American International |
Walsh |
|
 
| Walsh |
Anderson (SC) |
Anderson (SC) |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Anderson (SC) |
Assumption |
Assumption |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) |
Assumption |
Barton |
Walsh |
|
 
| Walsh |
Belmont Abbey |
Belmont Abbey |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Belmont Abbey |
Bentley |
Bentley |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Bentley |
Bridgeport |
Walsh |
|
 
| Walsh |
Caldwell |
Walsh |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Walsh |
Catawba |
Catawba |
|
 
| Catawba |
Chestnut Hill |
Walsh |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Walsh |
Chowan |
Walsh |
|
 
| Walsh |
Coker |
Coker |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Coker |
Colorado Mesa |
Colorado Mesa |
|
 
| Colorado Mesa |
Concordia-Irvine |
Concordia-Irvine |
|
 
| Concordia-Irvine |
D'Youville |
D'Youville |
D'Youville |
 
|
Davenport |
Davenport |
Davenport |
 
| |
Davis & Elkins |
Walsh |
Walsh |
 
| |
District of Columbia |
Walsh |
|
Walsh   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
Dominican (CA) |
Dominican (CA) |
|
 
| Dominican (CA) |
Dominican (NY) |
Walsh |
|
 
| Walsh |
Embry-Riddle |
Embry-Riddle |
|
 
| Embry-Riddle |
Emmanuel (GA) |
Walsh |
|
tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) |
Walsh |
Emory & Henry |
Walsh |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Walsh |
Felician |
Walsh |
|
tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) |
Walsh |
Flagler |
Flagler |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Flagler |
Florida Southern |
Florida Southern |
|
 
| Florida Southern |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
Franklin Pierce |
Walsh |
|
 
| Walsh |
Frostburg State |
Walsh |
Walsh |
 
|
Georgian Court |
Georgian Court |
|
 
| Georgian Court |
Holy Family |
Walsh |
|
tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) |
Walsh |
Indianapolis |
Indianapolis |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 4)( 2- 3) |
Indianapolis |
Lake Erie |
Walsh |
Walsh |
 
| |
Lander |
Lander |
Lander |
 
| |
Lees-McRae |
Walsh |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Walsh |
Lenoir-Rhyne |
Lenoir-Rhyne |
|
 
| Lenoir-Rhyne |
Lewis |
Lewis |
Lewis |
 
| |
Limestone |
Limestone |
|
Limestone   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Lincoln Memorial |
Lincoln Memorial |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Lincoln Memorial |
Lynn |
Lynn |
|
 
| Lynn |
Malone |
Walsh |
Walsh |
 
| |
Mars Hill |
Walsh |
|
tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) |
Walsh |
Maryville |
Maryville |
|
Maryville   3- 0 vs 0- 3 |
|
Mercy |
Mercy |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) |
Mercy |
Molloy |
Molloy |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) |
Molloy |
Montevallo |
Montevallo |
Montevallo |
 
| |
Mount Olive |
Mount Olive |
|
 
| Mount Olive |
Newberry |
Newberry |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Newberry |
North Greenville |
North Greenville |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
North Greenville |
Northwood |
Walsh |
Walsh |
 
| |
Pace |
Pace |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Pace |
Palm Beach Atlantic |
Palm Beach Atlantic |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Palm Beach Atlantic |
Post |
Walsh |
|
 
| Walsh |
Quincy |
Walsh |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) |
Walsh |
Roberts Wesleyan |
Walsh |
Walsh |
 
| |
Rockhurst |
Rockhurst |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) |
Rockhurst |
Rollins |
Rollins |
|
 
| Rollins |
Seton Hill |
Seton Hill |
Seton Hill |
 
| |
Shorter |
Walsh |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Walsh |
Southern New Hampshire |
Southern New Hampshire |
|
 
| Southern New Hampshire |
St Anselm |
St Anselm |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
St Anselm |
St Leo |
St Leo |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
St Leo |
St Michaels |
St Michaels |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) |
St Michaels |
St Thomas Aquinas |
Walsh |
|
Walsh   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
Tampa |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Tampa |
Thomas More |
Walsh |
Walsh |
 
| |
Tiffin |
Walsh |
Walsh |
 
| |
Tusculum |
Walsh |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Walsh |
Virginia State |
Walsh |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) |
Walsh |
Westminster (UT) |
Westminster (UT) |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Westminster (UT) |
Wheeling |
Wheeling |
Wheeling |
 
|
William Jewell |
Walsh |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) |
Walsh |
Wilmington (DE) |
Wilmington (DE) |
|
tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) |
Wilmington (DE) |
Wingate |
Wingate |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Wingate |
Young Harris |
Walsh |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Walsh |
PowerWise = 32

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 14.61
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Lewis (12- 5, 95.1) 7-14 -4.82 20.28 -0.64 0.81 -4.43
0 H D'Youville ( 6- 8, 87.3) 11-12 -12.65 12.45 -0.64 0.81 -10.79
0 H Frostburg Stat ( 7- 9, 91.0) 13- 8 -8.87 16.22 -0.64 0.81 12.64
0 N Lander ( 9- 7, 93.8) 4-14 -6.11 18.99 -0.00 0.81 -4.96
0 H Northwood ( 5- 9, 86.6) 17- 6 -13.27 11.82 -0.64 0.81 9.07
0 H Tiffin ( 3- 9, 84.3) 13- 6 -15.63 9.46 -0.64 0.81 7.16
0 A Wheeling ( 8- 7, 88.4) 8-10 -11.47 13.62 0.64 0.81 -8.79
0 H Lake Erie ( 7- 7, 88.2) 15- 4 -11.72 13.37 -0.64 0.81 10.33
0 A Roberts Wesley ( 6- 8, 89.5) 15-14 -10.35 14.74 0.64 0.81 12.49
0 H Montevallo (10- 6, 93.7) 5-11 -6.18 18.92 -0.64 0.81 -5.53
0 H Malone ( 5-10, 84.9) 15-10 -15.00 10.10 -0.64 0.81 7.67
0 A Davenport ( 6- 9, 88.4) 16-17 -11.52 13.58 0.64 0.81 -8.83
0 H Thomas More ( 1-11, 83.0) 23-11 -16.95 8.15 -0.64 0.81 6.09
0 A Davis & Elkins ( 2-15, 79.7) 24- 6 -20.22 4.88 0.64 0.81 4.48
0 H Seton Hill (17- 1, 98.6) 11-25 -1.31 23.78 -0.64 0.81 -1.59
0 H Northwood ( 5- 9, 86.6) 20- 8 -13.27 11.82 -0.64 0.81 9.07
0 A Lake Erie ( 7- 7, 88.2) 10- 8 -11.72 13.37 0.64 0.81 11.37
0 A Seton Hill (17- 1, 98.6) 5-20 -1.31 23.78 0.64 0.81 -0.54
------
44.92
|
winning pts = 90.3765 losing points = -45.4567
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------